By the Department of Telecommunications and Cable
Dockets:
Utility TypeDocketNameSubjectFiledClosedCategory
TELECOMM14-2Comcast of Massachusetts III v. Peabody MunicipalPole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.03/19/2014  
Docket Filings and Orders Issued (Electronic):
DocketDescriptionDateSubjectMemoURL
13-6Qwest's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Opposition of Qwest Communications Company, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink QCC to Motion for Summary Judgment. Filed by Alan Mandl.Click to see file
13-6Qwest's Certificate of Service to Opposition04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Opposition of Qwest Communications Company, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink QCC to Motion for Summary Judgment. Filed by Alan Mandl.Click to see file
13-6Comcast Phone's Opposition to Mtn Summary Judgment04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Comcast Phone of Massachusetts, Inc.'s Opposition to Competitive Carriers' Motion for Summary Judgment. Filed by Thaddeus A. Heuer.Click to see file
13-6Cover Letter of Verizon's Opposition to Judgment04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Verizon's Opposition to Summary Judgment04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Moore's Declaration in Support of Opposition04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit C, Comcast's Responses to CLEC's 1st Irs04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit E, XO's Opposition to VZ's Mtn to Compel04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit F, Comcast's Responses VZ's 1st Info Reqs04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit G, Malfara's Rebuttal Testimony for CLECs04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit H, Gillan's Rebuttal Testimony for CLECs04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit I, Gillan's Direct Testimony for CLECs04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit J, Rebuttal Testimonies for Verizon04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit K, AT&T Michigan and Sprint's ICA04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit L, Sprintcom v. Illinois Bell/Commission04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Exhibit M, Sprint and Indiana Bell Hearing Dates04/11/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6CL CLEC's Opposition to VZ's Motion to Compel04/07/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Opposition to Verizon's Motion to Compel. Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6CLEC's Opposition to Verizon's Motion to Compel04/07/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Opposition to Verizon's Motion to Compel. Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
14-2DPU's Notice of Intervention & Appearance Counsel04/07/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Department of Public Utilities Notice of Intervention and Appearance of Counsel. Filed by Alison Lackey.Click to see file
13-6Cover Letter of Sprint's Supplemental Responses04/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Supplemental Responses to DTC's Information Requests 1-2 and 1-6. Motion for Confidential Treatment of Supplemental Response to 1-1. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Sprint's Mtn for Confidential Trt Resp DTC 1-104/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Supplemental Responses to DTC's Information Requests 1-2 and 1-6. Motion for Confidential Treatment of Supplemental Response to 1-1. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Sprint's Supplemental Response to DTC's 1-2 IR04/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Supplemental Responses to DTC's Information Requests 1-2 and 1-6. Motion for Confidential Treatment of Supplemental Response to 1-1. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Sprint's Supplemental Response to DTC's 1-6 IR04/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Supplemental Responses to DTC's Information Requests 1-2 and 1-6. Motion for Confidential Treatment of Supplemental Response to 1-1. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Attachment to 1-204/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Supplemental Responses to DTC's Information Requests 1-2 and 1-6. Motion for Confidential Treatment of Supplemental Response to 1-1. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Sprint's ICA with AT&T Michigan04/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Supplemental Responses to DTC's Information Requests 1-2 and 1-6. Motion for Confidential Treatment of Supplemental Response to 1-1. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Verizon's Supplemental Response to DTC's 1-104/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Supplemental Response to Department's Information Request 1-1 and Motion for Confidential Treatment of Response. (Redacted version available only.) Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6XO's Supplemental Response to Verizon's IR 1-104/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252XO Communication Services, LLC's ("XO") supplemental response to Verizon's Information Request 1-1, and XO's Opposition to Verizon's Motion to Compel. Filed by Eric J. Krathwohl, Esq.Click to see file
13-6XO's Opposition to Verizon's Motion to Compel04/04/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252XO Communication Services, LLC's ("XO") supplemental response to Verizon's Information Request 1-1, and XO's Opposition to Verizon's Motion to Compel. Filed by Eric J. Krathwohl, Esq.Click to see file
14-2Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Respond04/02/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Hearing Officer's Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint.Click to see file
14-2Docket Letter04/01/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Hearing Officer's notification that complaint has been assigned docket 14-2.Click to see file
14-2Peabody MLP and MLC's Motion to Extend Time04/01/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Comcast. Filed by Nicholas Scobbo.Click to see file
13-6Verizon's Motion to Compel Responses to 1st Irs03/31/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Motion to Compel Responses by the Intervenors to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests, specifically 1-1 and 1-2. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Cvr Ltr CLEC's Mtn Judgment and Kennan Declaration03/31/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Motion for Summary Judgment and Declaration of Gregory M. Kennan (Exhibit H of Declaration is redacted and Motion is redacted). Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6Kennan's Declaration03/31/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Motion for Summary Judgment and Declaration of Gregory M. Kennan (Exhibit H of Declaration is redacted and Motion is redacted). Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6CLEC's Motion for Summary Judgment03/31/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Motion for Summary Judgment and Declaration of Gregory M. Kennan (Exhibit H of Declaration is redacted and Motion is redacted). Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-8Notice of Hearing03/31/2014Petition of Charter Communications to establish and adjust the basic service tier programming, equipment and installation rates for the communities served by Charter that are currently subject to rate regulation.Notice of Public Hearing, Order of Notice, and First Set of Information Requests.Click to see file
13-8Order of Notice03/31/2014Petition of Charter Communications to establish and adjust the basic service tier programming, equipment and installation rates for the communities served by Charter that are currently subject to rate regulation.Notice of Public Hearing, Order of Notice, and First Set of Information Requests.Click to see file
13-8First Set of Information Requests03/31/2014Petition of Charter Communications to establish and adjust the basic service tier programming, equipment and installation rates for the communities served by Charter that are currently subject to rate regulation.Notice of Public Hearing, Order of Notice, and First Set of Information Requests.Click to see file
13-6XO Comm Svcs, LLC's Responses to Verizon's 1st IRs03/27/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252XO Communication Services, LLC's Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Filed by Eric J. Krathwohl.Click to see file
13-6Verizon's Supplemental Response to CLEC's IR 2-603/26/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Supplemental Response to Competitve Carriers' Information Request 2-6. (Attachments to 2-6 confidential and not available online.) Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Cover Letter of Sprint's Responses to VZ's 1st Irs03/24/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Sprint's Responses to Verizon's 1st Info Requests03/24/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Filed by Benjamin J. Aron.Click to see file
13-6Cover Letter of CLECs' Responses to VZ's 1st Irs03/24/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Responses to 1-3 and 1-5 by tw data services, Level 3, and PAETEC have both redacted and confidential versions. (Confidential version not available.) Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6CLECs' Mtn for Confidential Trt Responses to VZ03/24/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Responses to 1-3 and 1-5 by tw data services, Level 3, and PAETEC have both redacted and confidential versions. (Confidential version not available.) Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6CLECs' Objections to Verizon's 1st Info Requests03/24/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Responses to 1-3 and 1-5 by tw data services, Level 3, and PAETEC have both redacted and confidential versions. (Confidential version not available.) Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6CLECs' Responses to Verizon's 1st Info Requests03/24/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Competitive Carriers' Responses to Verizon's First Set of Information Requests. Responses to 1-3 and 1-5 by tw data services, Level 3, and PAETEC have both redacted and confidential versions. (Confidential version not available.) Filed by Gregory M. Kennan.Click to see file
13-6Verizon's Responses to CLEC's 2nd Info Requests03/20/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Responses to Competitive Carrier's Second Set of Information Requests. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
09-1Notice of Intent to Close Investigation03/19/2014Regional Service Quality Investigation into Verizon New England's Basic Service Quality in Western MassachusettsNotice of Intent to Close Investigation.Click to see file
13-6Verizon's Responses to DTC's 2nd Info Requests03/19/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Verizon's Responses to Department's Second Set of Information Requests. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.Click to see file
13-6Sprint's Cover Letter of Responses to DTC's 1st IR03/19/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Responses to Department's First Information Requests. Filed by Benjamin J. AronClick to see file
13-6Sprint's Responses to DTC's 1st Info Requests03/19/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Sprint's Responses to Department's First Information Requests. Filed by Benjamin J. AronClick to see file
13-6Comcast Phone's Responses to CLEC's 2nd Info Reqs03/19/2014Investigation by the Department on its Own Motion to Determine whether an Agreement entered into by Verizon New England Inc., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts is an Interconnect Agreement under 47 U.S.C. § 251 Requiring the Agreement to be filed with the Department for Approval in Accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 252Comcast Phone of Massachusetts, Inc.'s Responses to Competitive Carriers' Second Set of Information Requests. Filed by Thaddeus A. Heuer.Click to see file
14-2Cover Letter and Initial Complaint03/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
14-2Exhibit 1 and 203/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
14-2Exhibits 3, 4, and 503/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
14-2Exhibits 6, 7, 8, and 903/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
14-2Exhibits 10, 11, 12, and 1303/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
14-2Exhibits 14, 15, and 1603/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
14-2White's Affidavit and Exhibit List03/19/2014Pole Attachment Rate complaint of Comcast Massachusetts III, Inc. v. Peabody Municipal Light Plant and Peabody Municipal Lighting Commission.Pole Attachment Rate Complaint filed by Comcast Massachusetts, III, Inc. Filed by Kevin Conroy.Click to see file
Docket Filings (All):
DocketDateUtilityNameDescription
TCA-MA-411/26/2014  Tariff No 4, tariff material consists of the Special Pricing Arrangements Local Exchange Services - Original Sheets554 through 558. The CSP arrangement is in response to the specific, individual requirements of the customer and/or a competitive bidding process. It differs from the Company's standard tariff offering in that it contains a custom service arrangement and/or term and/or volume commitments. Because the CSP customer is not ""under like circumstances"" as other customers, the CSP arrangement complies and is consistent with the statutory and regulatory requirements set forth in MA GL, Ch 159 and DPU 90-24. AT&T is adding newly negotiated rates for the 193rd through 194th distinct contract in the SPA section of the tariff. Issued 11/26/13, effective 12/28/2013. Assigned to Dinesh., CW
TIME WARNER04/15/2014  FCC Form 394s regarding transfer of Time Warner to Comcast.
EASTHAMPTON04/14/2014  Charter Form 100. Filed by Thomas P. Cohan. FORM 100
HARVARD04/14/2014  Charter Form 100. Filed by Thomas P. Cohan. FORM 100.
HINSDALE04/14/2014  Charter Form 100. Filed by Thomas P. Cohan. FORM 100
NORTH BROOKFIELD04/14/2014  Charter Form 100. Filed by Thomas P. Cohan. Form 100.
STURBRIDGE04/14/2014  Charter Form 100. Filed by Thomas P. Cohan. FORM 100.
13-604/11/2014Comcast Phone of Massachusetts, Inc.Thaddeus A. HeuerComcast Phone of Massachusetts, Inc.'s Opposition to Competitive Carriers' Motion for Summary Judgment. Filed by Thaddeus A. Heuer.
CHARTER04/11/2014  Form 200, 300, 400 again? RPN
13-604/11/2014Qwest Communications Company, LLCAlan MandlOpposition of Qwest Communications Company, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink QCC to Motion for Summary Judgment. Filed by Alan Mandl.
13-604/11/2014VerizonAlexander W. MooreVerizon's Opposition to Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment. Exhibits A, B, and D filed confidentially only and not available. Filed by Alexander W. Moore.
SBC-MA-1204/11/2014  Revisions to its tariff no 12, the purpose of thids filing is to modify general regulations and mulitple small business plan term renewal terms and conditions. Filed by Edward Arellano, Iss 4/11/2014, Eff: 5/12/2014. Assigned to Kerri on 4/14/2014, CW
VRZ-MA-1204/11/2014  Revisions to tariff no 12,See Check sheet. This filing extends existing CSP Plan that provides a major customer with service at negotiated rates and conditions as specified in the cotnract signed by the customer and Verizon. TT 14-33/Cust. No. 2014-15 Issued 4/10/2014, effective 5/10/2014. Filed by Patricia Eagen Assigned to Dinesh on 4/14/2014..,CW
TCA-MA-504/11/2014  Revisions to its tariff no 5, With this filing AT&T is making revisions to the VoIP language with regards to rating of VoIP-PSTN traffic, and the calculation and application of Percent-VoIP usage factors. Filed by Al Stone , Iss: 4/11/2014 Eff:5/12/2014, Assigned to Armine on 4/14/2014, CW
ATT-MA-404/11/2014  Revisions to its tariff no 4, With this filing AT&T is making revisions to the VoIP language with regards to rating of VoIP-PSTN traffic, and the calculation and application of Percent-VoIP usage factors. Filed by Al Stone , Iss: 4/11/2014 Eff:5/12/2014, Assigned to Armine on 4/14/2014, CW
SOMERSET04/10/2014  Letter of Receipt of License Expiration Notice. Town anticipates completion of renewal process by the expiration of current license. Second public ascertainment to be held on April 16, 2014. Filed by Dennis F. Luttrell. LIC
HOLLAND04/10/2014  Letter of Receipt of License Expiration Notice. Town anticipates receiving proposed renewal license in about a week. Filed by Amy S. Bishop. LIC
SPR-MA-304/10/2014  Revisions to its tariff no 3, The purpose of this filing is to make revisions in the form of 3251st Revised Checksheet and the 238th Revised Chescksheet. Filed by Shelia Davenport, Iss: 4/9/201 Eff: 05/10/14, Assigned to Kerri on 4/10/2014, CW